Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Health Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, B.
Right arrow Articles by Lilford, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, B.
Right arrow Articles by Lilford, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

How can Action Research Apply to Health Services?

Brian Morrison

Richard Lilford

University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg

The authors ask whether and how action research can apply to health services research, given action research’s claim to be radically different from mainstream research. They analyze the key tenets of an idealized version of action research, comparing them with those of the approach characteristic of mainstream research. The authors conclude, firstly, that action research deserves all credit for pioneering flexible and imaginative ways of working. Yet, there is nothing in the fundamental logic of the mainstream approach to preclude it from adopting some of these. Action researchers therefore need to reconsider their critical stance toward mainstream research. Conversely, mainstream researchers need to reconsider their critical stance toward the ways of working pioneered by action research and to adopt them as appropriate.

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, 436-449 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/104973201129119235


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Action ResearchHome page
T. J. Mendenhall and W. J. Doherty
Partners in Diabetes: Action research in a primary care setting
Action Research, December 1, 2007; 5(4): 378 - 406.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
C. Pope
Review: Exploring the effectiveness of action research as a tool for organizational change in health care
Journal of Research in Nursing, July 1, 2007; 12(4): 401 - 402.
[PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
H. Waterman, M. Marshall, J. Noble, H. Davies, K. Walshe, R. Sheaff, and G. Elwyn
The Role of Action Research in the Investigation and Diffusion of Innovations in Health Care: The PRIDE Project
Qual Health Res, March 1, 2007; 17(3): 373 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
H. van Eyk and F. Baum
Evaluating Health System Change-Using Focus Groups and a Developing Discussion Paper to Compile the "Voices From the Field"
Qual Health Res, February 1, 2003; 13(2): 281 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
P. Bate and G. Robert
Studying Health Care "Quality" Qualitatively: The Dilemmas and Tensions between Different Forms of Evaluation Research within the U.K. National Health Service
Qual Health Res, September 1, 2002; 12(7): 966 - 981.
[Abstract] [PDF]