Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Health Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolcott, H. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolcott, H. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Conference

Writing Up Qualitative Research... Better

Harry F. Wolcott

Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon, Eugene.

The author presents his views for breaking from the traditional order ("Chapter Two" in many studies) and segregation of topics—literature review, theory, and method—in favor of integrating these components into a report only as needed. He urges researchers to consider alternative ways of satisfying the intent of a literature review. He questions whether traditional requirements result in theories being forced or presented prematurely, and raises the possibility of presenting multiple or cumulative theories toward the study’s end. He notes that qualitative research is based on participant observation and the resulting insights and wonders whether an emphasis on methodology detracts from our studies. Engaging writing can result when writers are free to break with tradition and present their findings in discovery-oriented ways.

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, 91-103 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1049732302012001007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
E. H. Erwin, A. Meyer, and N. McClain
Use of an Audit in Violence Prevention Research
Qual Health Res, May 1, 2005; 15(5): 707 - 718.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
S. Mantzoukas
Issues of Representation within Qualitative Inquiry
Qual Health Res, September 1, 2004; 14(7): 994 - 1007.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
P. L. Johnstone
Mixed Methods, Mixed Methodology Health Services Research in Practice
Qual Health Res, February 1, 2004; 14(2): 259 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
West J Nurs ResHome page
J. M. Hall
Analyzing Women's Roles through Graphic Representation of Narratives
West J Nurs Res, August 1, 2003; 25(5): 492 - 507.
[Abstract] [PDF]