|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically
Sheila Hawker
Department of Social Work Studies, University of Southampton, U.K.
Sheila Payne
Palliative Care, Trent Palliative Care Centre, Sheffield, U.K.
Christine Kerr
Department of Social Work Studies, University of Southampton, U.K.
Michael Hardey
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton, U.K.
Jackie Powell
Department of Social Work Studies, University of Southampton
The authors describe a method of systematically reviewing research from different paradigms. They draw on the methods adapted, developed, and designed during a study concerned with the delivery of care across professional boundaries. Informed by the established method of systematic review, the authors undertook the review in distinct stages. They describe the methods developed for each stage and outline the difficulties encountered, the solutions devised, and the appraisal tools developed. Although many of the problems encountered were related to the critical assessment of qualitative research, the authors argue that the method of systematic review can be adapted for use with different data and across disciplines.
Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 12, No. 9,
1284-1299 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1049732302238251

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S Innes and S Payne
Advanced cancer patients' prognostic information preferences: a review
Palliative Medicine,
January 1, 2009;
23(1):
29 - 39.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Docherty, A. Owens, M. Asadi-Lari, R. Petchey, J. Williams, and Y. H Carter
Knowledge and information needs of informal caregivers in palliative care: a qualitative systematic review
Palliative Medicine,
March 1, 2008;
22(2):
153 - 171.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Tennant, M. A. Mohammed, J. J. Coleman, and U. Martin
Monitoring patients using control charts: a systematic review
Int. J. Qual. Health Care,
August 1, 2007;
19(4):
187 - 194.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Stevens, S. Payne, C. Burton, J. Addington-Hall, and A. Jones
Palliative care in stroke: a critical review of the literature
Palliative Medicine,
June 1, 2007;
21(4):
323 - 331.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R Goldsmith, C. R Bankhead, and J. Austoker
Synthesising quantitative and qualitative research in evidence-based patient information
J Epidemiol Community Health,
March 1, 2007;
61(3):
262 - 270.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Ogilvie, M. Egan, V. Hamilton, and M. Petticrew
Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 2. Best available evidence: how low should you go?
J Epidemiol Community Health,
October 1, 2005;
59(10):
886 - 892.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Ogilvie, V. Hamilton, M. Egan, and M. Petticrew
Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go?
J Epidemiol Community Health,
September 1, 2005;
59(9):
804 - 808.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N Ahmed, J E Bestall, S H Ahmedzai, S A Payne, D Clark, and B Noble
Systematic review of the problems and issues of accessing specialist palliative care by patients, carers and health and social care professionals
Palliative Medicine,
September 1, 2004;
18(6):
525 - 542.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C Ingleton, S Payne, M Nolan, and I Carey
Respite in palliative care: a review and discussion of the literature
Palliative Medicine,
October 1, 2003;
17(7):
567 - 575.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|