Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Health Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hawker, S.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hawker, S.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically

Sheila Hawker

Department of Social Work Studies, University of Southampton, U.K.

Sheila Payne

Palliative Care, Trent Palliative Care Centre, Sheffield, U.K.

Christine Kerr

Department of Social Work Studies, University of Southampton, U.K.

Michael Hardey

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton, U.K.

Jackie Powell

Department of Social Work Studies, University of Southampton

The authors describe a method of systematically reviewing research from different paradigms. They draw on the methods adapted, developed, and designed during a study concerned with the delivery of care across professional boundaries. Informed by the established method of systematic review, the authors undertook the review in distinct stages. They describe the methods developed for each stage and outline the difficulties encountered, the solutions devised, and the appraisal tools developed. Although many of the problems encountered were related to the critical assessment of qualitative research, the authors argue that the method of systematic review can be adapted for use with different data and across disciplines.

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 12, No. 9, 1284-1299 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1049732302238251


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
S Innes and S Payne
Advanced cancer patients' prognostic information preferences: a review
Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 29 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
A. Docherty, A. Owens, M. Asadi-Lari, R. Petchey, J. Williams, and Y. H Carter
Knowledge and information needs of informal caregivers in palliative care: a qualitative systematic review
Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2008; 22(2): 153 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
R. Tennant, M. A. Mohammed, J. J. Coleman, and U. Martin
Monitoring patients using control charts: a systematic review
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2007; 19(4): 187 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
T. Stevens, S. Payne, C. Burton, J. Addington-Hall, and A. Jones
Palliative care in stroke: a critical review of the literature
Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2007; 21(4): 323 - 331.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M. R Goldsmith, C. R Bankhead, and J. Austoker
Synthesising quantitative and qualitative research in evidence-based patient information
J Epidemiol Community Health, March 1, 2007; 61(3): 262 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
D. Ogilvie, M. Egan, V. Hamilton, and M. Petticrew
Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 2. Best available evidence: how low should you go?
J Epidemiol Community Health, October 1, 2005; 59(10): 886 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
D. Ogilvie, V. Hamilton, M. Egan, and M. Petticrew
Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go?
J Epidemiol Community Health, September 1, 2005; 59(9): 804 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
N Ahmed, J E Bestall, S H Ahmedzai, S A Payne, D Clark, and B Noble
Systematic review of the problems and issues of accessing specialist palliative care by patients, carers and health and social care professionals
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2004; 18(6): 525 - 542.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
C Ingleton, S Payne, M Nolan, and I Carey
Respite in palliative care: a review and discussion of the literature
Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2003; 17(7): 567 - 575.
[Abstract] [PDF]