Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Health Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morse, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morse, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Review Committee's Guide for Evaluating Qualitative Proposals

Janice M. Morse, Ph.D.(Nurs.), Ph.D.(Anthro.), D.Nurs.(Hon.), F.A.A.N.

International Institute for Qualitative Methodology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

Although they complain that qualitative proposals are not reviewed fairly when funding agencies use quantitative criteria, qualitative researchers have failed the system by not developing alternative criteria for the evaluation of qualitative proposals. In this article, the author corrects this deficit by presenting criteria to assess the relevance, rigor, and feasibility of qualitative research. These criteria are not a checklist but rather a series of questions that can aid a reviewer, adept in qualitative methods, to comprehensively evaluate and defend qualitative research.

Key Words: proposal evaluation • qualitative research • standards

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 13, No. 6, 833-851 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1049732303013006005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
B. Stige, K. Malterud, and T. Midtgarden
Toward an Agenda for Evaluation of Qualitative Research
Qual Health Res, October 1, 2009; 19(10): 1504 - 1516.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
D. K. Padgett and B. F. Henwood
Obtaining Large-Scale Funding for Empowerment-Oriented Qualitative Research: A Report From Personal Experience
Qual Health Res, June 1, 2009; 19(6): 868 - 874.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Nurs EthicsHome page
P. J Larkin, B. D. de Casterle, and P. Schotsmans
A Relational Ethical Dialogue With Research Ethics Committees
Nursing Ethics, March 1, 2008; 15(2): 234 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 West J Nurs ResHome page
Response by Kooken, Haase, and Russell
West J Nurs Res, November 1, 2007; 29(7): 927 - 929.
[PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
W. El Ansari and E. S Weiss
Quality of research on community partnerships: developing the evidence base
Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2006; 21(2): 175 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]