This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Power, E. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Power, E. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Toward Understanding in Postmodern Interview Analysis: Interpreting the Contradictory Remarks of a Research Participant

University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

How is the qualitative research analyst to understand apparently contradictory remarks made by a research participant? Although social scientists in the positivist tradition rely on methods such as triangulation to find "truth," interpretive social scientists listen beyond, between, and underneath participants’ words to understand the social conditions that produce apparent contradictions in their accounts. In this article, the author presents a case study of making sense of a research participant’s contradictory comments, using a theoretical framework to understand the participant’s "logic of practice." Through interpretive listening and reflexivity during the data analysis, she came to understand the participant’s contradictory remarks in a way that illuminated the contradictions, as well as a significant process in the participant’s life at the time: the transformation from carefree daughter to responsible mother. Such an interpretive analysis does not produce "truth" as positivist social scientists require but offers instead the satisfaction of understanding.

Key Words: interviewing • Bourdieu • reflexivity • logic of practice • interpretive analysis

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 14, No. 6, 858-865 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1049732304265935


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. M. Carter, C. F. C. Jordens, C. McGrath, and M. Little You Have to Make Something of All That Rubbish, Do You? An Empirical Investigation of the Social Process of Qualitative Research Qual Health Res, September 1, 2008; 18(9): 1264 - 1276. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Watson Unreliable narrators? 'Inconsistency' (and some inconstancy) in interviews Qualitative Research, August 1, 2006; 6(3): 367 - 384. [Abstract] [PDF]