This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hay, J. Articles by Ostroff, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hay, J. Articles by Ostroff, J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Cancer Smoking Smoking and Youth Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Thinking Through Cancer Risk: Characterizing Smokers' Process of Risk Determination

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York

Elyse Shuk

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York

Gustavo Cruz

New York University College of Dentistry, New York

Jamie Ostroff

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York

The perception of cancer risk motivates cancer risk reduction behaviors. However, common measurement strategies for cancer risk perceptions, which involve numerical likelihood estimates, do not adequately capture individuals' thoughts and feelings about cancer risk. To guide the development of novel measurement strategies, the authors used semistructured interviews to examine the thought processes used by smokers (N = 15) as they considered their cancer risk. They used grounded theory to guide systematic data coding and develop a heuristic model describing smokers' risk perception process that includes a cognitive, primarily rational process whereby salient personal risk factors for cancer are considered and combined, and an affective/attitudinal process, which shifts risk perceptions either up or down. The model provides a tentative explanation concerning how people hold cancer risk perceptions that diverge from rational assessment of their risks and will be useful in guiding the development of non-numerical measurements strategies for cancer risk perceptions.

Key Words: cancer • perceived risk • smoking behavior

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 15, No. 8, 1074-1085 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276682


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Bunting and J. Boivin Knowledge about infertility risk factors, fertility myths and illusory benefits of healthy habits in young people Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1858 - 1864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Watkins, F. C. Cooke, R. J. Donovan, C. R. MacIntyre, R. Itzwerth, and A. J. Plant Tackle the Problem When It Gets Here: Pandemic Preparedness Among Small and Medium Businesses Qual Health Res, July 1, 2008; 18(7): 902 - 912. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Chapple, S. Ziebland, P. Hewitson, and A. McPherson Why Men in the United Kingdom Still Want the Prostate Specific Antigen Test Qual Health Res, January 1, 2008; 18(1): 56 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Peretti-Watel, J. Constance, P. Guilbert, A. Gautier, F. Beck, and J.-P. Moatti Smoking too few cigarettes to be at risk? Smokers' perceptions of risk and risk denial, a French survey Tob. Control, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 351 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Dowding Personal beliefs, experiences, and emotions influenced smokers' perceptions of their cancer risk Evid. Based Nurs., July 1, 2006; 9(3): 92 - 92. [Full Text] [PDF]