Qualitative Health Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forbat, L.
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forbat, L.
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 15, No. 8, 1114-1128 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1049732305279065

Theoretical and Practical Reflections on Sharing Transcripts With Participants

Liz Forbat

Centre for Research on Families and Relationships, Edinburgh University, United Kingdom

Jeanette Henderson

Faculty of Health and Social Care at The Open University, Milton Keyes, United Kingdom

This article is a critical reflection on the process of creating transcripts and sharing them with interviewees. It relates to two elements of the research process: first, sharing transcripts with research participants and, second, participants’ seeing extracts from transcripts in academic writing. The authors explore participants’ experiences of revisiting the interview in written form by reflecting on the interconnections between social research methods and epistemology. They also consider the ethical implications of this process. They consider the relationship between the transcript and the representation (re-presentation) of what participants believe to have occurred within the interview. This leads to a discussion of the importance of developing reflexivity with respect to the practice and processes of sharing transcripts.

Key Words: ethics • epistemology • reflexivity • sensitive subjects • transcription


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
A. Salmon
Walking the Talk: How Participatory Interview Methods Can Democratize Research
Qual Health Res, September 1, 2007; 17(7): 982 - 993.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
J. Giordano, M. O'Reilly, H. Taylor, and N. Dogra
Confidentiality and Autonomy: The Challenge(s) of Offering Research Participants a Choice of Disclosing Their Identity
Qual Health Res, February 1, 2007; 17(2): 264 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]