Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Health Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morse, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morse, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Politics of Evidence

Janice M. Morse

International Institute for Qualitative Methodology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

The evidenced-based movement has influenced medical research to the point that the agendas and methods of qualitative inquiry are often excluded from resources of medical granting agencies. Yet, its narrow definition of what constitutes evidence and its myopic vision about health must be challenged. In this article, the author argues that qualitative research does contribute to a reduction in morbidity and mortality without the cost in dollars and lives that are necessarily incurred in evidence-based inquiry. She asserts that we must reframe our definition of evidence to meet this new ethic of inquiry—which she calls the ultimate ethic—as a way of conducting research.

Key Words: qualitative evidence • types of evidence • ethics

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 16, No. 3, 395-404 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1049732305285482


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
B. Stige, K. Malterud, and T. Midtgarden
Toward an Agenda for Evaluation of Qualitative Research
Qual Health Res, October 1, 2009; 19(10): 1504 - 1516.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Child Psychol PsychiatryHome page
N. Midgley
Editorial: Improvers, Adapters and Rejecters -- the Link between `Evidence-based Practice' and `Evidence-based Practitioners'
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, July 1, 2009; 14(3): 323 - 327.
[PDF]


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
N. K. Denzin
The elephant in the living room: or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence
Qualitative Research, April 1, 2009; 9(2): 139 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
L. Todres
Being With That: The Relevance of Embodied Understanding for Practice
Qual Health Res, November 1, 2008; 18(11): 1566 - 1573.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Review for the Sociology of SportHome page
M. P. Sam and J. Scherer
Stand Up and Be Counted: Numerical Storylines in a Stadium Debate
International Review for the Sociology of Sport, March 1, 2008; 43(1): 53 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]