Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Health Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clavering, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by McLaughlin, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clavering, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by McLaughlin, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Crossing Multidisciplinary Divides: Exploring Professional Hierarchies and Boundaries in Focus Groups

Emma K. Clavering

University of Newcastle, United Kingdom

Janice McLaughlin

University of Newcastle, United Kingdom

Focus groups are an important element of qualitative health research, valued for the forms of knowledge and understanding that emerge from interactions among participants. Common advice for focus groups within health research is to limit the level of variation among respondents to generate comprehensive discussion and shared knowledge. In this article, the authors critically examine this advice, proposing instead that it is useful to acknowledge and, at times, consciously build in heterogeneity across categories of those present. The benefit of doing this is that the interaction thus generated can be used as a space within which to explore differing professional positions and interpretations of issues under discussion. Using research they have done, they explore the practical issues involved in getting different health and social care professionals together and go on to discuss the value and significance of using focus groups to explore the production of professional hierarchies and boundaries.

Key Words: focus groups • health and social care professionals

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 17, No. 3, 400-410 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1049732306298380
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
P. A. Forgeron, D. Jongudomkarn, J. Evans, G. A. Finley, S. Thienthong, P. Siripul, S. Pairojkul, W. Sriraj, and K. Boonyawatanangkool
Children's Pain Assessment in Northeastern Thailand: Perspectives of Health Professionals
Qual Health Res, January 1, 2009; 19(1): 71 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 SociologyHome page
J. McLaughlin and D. Goodley
Seeking and Rejecting Certainty: Exposing the Sophisticated Lifeworlds of Parents of Disabled Babies
Sociology, April 1, 2008; 42(2): 317 - 335.
[Abstract] [PDF]