Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Health Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by McKinlay, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by McKinlay, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Using Focus Groups to Improve the Validity of Cross-National Survey Research: A Study of Physician Decision Making

Amy B. O'Donnell

New England Research Institutes

Karen E. Lutfey

New England Research Institutes

Lisa D. Marceau

New England Research Institutes

John B. McKinlay

New England Research Institutes

In this article, the authors demonstrate how qualitative methods can form a foundation for quantitative research by improving instrument validity, informing the data collection process, and improving cost-effectiveness in a study of physician decision making. To test terminology, applicability, and comprehension of a quantitative questionnaire for doctors in the United States and United Kingdom, each country's researchers conducted physician focus groups with questions organized around the experiment, including (a) validity of video vignettes of actor "patients," (b) population accessibility, (c) level of remuneration, (d) appropriate endorsement figure, and (e) question comprehension. Focus group data collected during instrument development and fieldwork planning streamlined processes and achieved cost efficiencies and effectiveness for the overall study. Beyond simply adding a post hoc qualitative component to an already free-standing quantitative methodology, focus groups were used in the study formulation, where the qualitative methodology was integrated into the process of developing a valid survey instrument.

Key Words: quantitative research • qualitative research • research methodologies • focus groups • physician decision making

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 17, No. 7, 971-981 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1049732307305257
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
D. Groleau, P. Zelkowitz, and I. E. Cabral
Enhancing Generalizability: Moving From an Intimate to a Political Voice
Qual Health Res, March 1, 2009; 19(3): 416 - 426.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
B. J. Lutz, S. Kneipp, and D. Means
Developing a Health Screening Questionnaire for Women in Welfare Transition Programs in the United States
Qual Health Res, January 1, 2009; 19(1): 105 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]