Qualitative Health Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Draucker, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rusk, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Draucker, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rusk, T. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 17, No. 8, 1137-1148 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1049732307308450

Theoretical Sampling and Category Development in Grounded Theory

Claire B. Draucker

Kent State University, cdraucke{at}kent.edu

Donna S. Martsolf

Kent State University

Ratchneewan Ross

Kent State University

Thomas B. Rusk

Kent State University

Theoretical sampling is a hallmark of grounded theory methodology, and yet there is little guidance available for researchers on how to implement this process. A review of recently published grounded theory studies in Qualitative Health Research revealed that researchers often indicate that they use theoretical sampling to choose new participants, to modify interview guides, or to add data sources as a study progresses, but few describe how theoretical sampling is implemented in response to emergent findings. In this article, two issues that arose relative to theoretical sampling in an ongoing grounded theory study are discussed. A theoretical sampling guide that was developed by the authors' research team to facilitate systematic decision making and to enhance the audit trail relative to theoretical sampling is described, and an example of how the guide was used to develop a category is presented.

Key Words: theoretical sampling • grounded theory • sexual violence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
N. L. Holt, B. A. Moylan, J. C. Spence, J. M. Lenk, Z. L. Sehn, and G. D. C. Ball
Treatment Preferences of Overweight Youth and Their Parents in Western Canada
Qual Health Res, September 1, 2008; 18(9): 1206 - 1219.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
C. B. Draucker and D. S. Martsolf
Storying Childhood Sexual Abuse
Qual Health Res, August 1, 2008; 18(8): 1034 - 1048.
[Abstract] [PDF]