This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Smith, M. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Smith, M. W. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Ethics in Focus Groups: A Few Concerns

Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C, DCMicke{at}aol.com

Although the focus group methodology has become an increasingly popular research measure in the past 15 years, very little has been written about the ethical issues. Although the question of ethics is not unique to this approach, there are ethical issues that are specific to the focus group interview. The major issue to consider as a researcher using this technique is the potential of over disclosure by the participants, particularly if the research topic is sensitive. As researchers we are obligated to insure that participants in our studies are not harmed (physically or psychologically) by our research. To provide research participants the safest environment possible, the researcher must have an understanding and ability to apply ethical theories to their situations. This article discusses ethical theories, specific ethical concerns to focus groups, the role of the researcher in such cases, and makes recommendations for future consideration.

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, 478-486 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/104973239500500408


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Hyde, J. Drennan, E. Howlett, and D. Brady Young Men's Vulnerability in Constituting Hegemonic Masculinity in Sexual Relations American Journal of Men's Health, September 1, 2009; 3(3): 238 - 251. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Gibson Conducting focus groups with children and young people: strategies for success Journal of Research in Nursing, September 1, 2007; 12(5): 473 - 483. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. L. Bennstam, M. Strandmark, and V. K. Diwan Perception of Tuberculosis in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Wali Ya Nkumu in the Mai Ndombe District Qual Health Res, March 1, 2004; 14(3): 299 - 312. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Davidson, K. Introna, J. Daly, G. Paull, R. Jarvis, J. Angus, T. Wilds, J. Cockburn, M. Dunford, and K. Dracup Cardiorespiratory Nurses' Perceptions of Palliative Care in Nonmalignant Disease: Data for the Development of Clinical Practice Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2003; 12(1): 47 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Vissandjee, S. N. Abdool, and S. Dupere Focus Groups in Rural Gujarat, India: A Modified Approach Qual Health Res, July 1, 2002; 12(6): 826 - 843. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. M. Heary and E. Hennessy The Use of Focus Group Interviews in Pediatric Health Care Research J. Pediatr. Psychol., January 1, 2002; 27(1): 47 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Frith Focusing on Sex: Using Focus Groups in Sex Research Sexualities, August 1, 2000; 3(3): 275 - 297. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. I. Balch and D. M. Mertens Focus Group Design and Group Dynamics: Lessons from Deaf and Hard of Hearing Participants American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 1999; 20(2): 265 - 277. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A.M. Jinks and F. Redworth Evaluation of an education programme designed to suggest possible changes to leisure day service provision J Intellect Disabil., June 1, 1998; 2(2): 66 - 70. [Abstract] [PDF]