This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Carey, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Carey, M. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Comment: Concerns in the Analysis of Focus Group Data

Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Public Health Service

The most frequent concern in qualitative research is an inadequate description of the analysis process, and the consequent limitation on credibility and usefulness of the results. Of all the aspects of using the focus group technique—advantages and limitations, logistics, implementation, and interpreting and reporting of results—the process of analysis is the least agreed on and the least well developed. There is little guidance for researchers, journal editors and reviewers, graduate students and their advisors. A frequent question is "how to do" analysis of focus group data, especially analysis worthy of federal-level funding or acceptable at the level of an academic dissertation. Definitive, mutually agreed on technique does not exist. Decisions in analysis depend on many factors, and this article will discuss considerations in planning and implementing analyses of focus group data.

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, 487-495 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/104973239500500409


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R.S. Hebert, R. Schulz, V.C. Copeland, and R.M. Arnold Pilot Testing of a Question Prompt Sheet to Encourage Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients and Physicians to Discuss End-of-life Issues American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, February 1, 2009; 26(1): 24 - 32. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Grow and S. A. Christopher Breaking the Silence Surrounding Hepatitis C by Promoting Self-Efficacy: Hepatitis C Public Service Announcements Qual Health Res, October 1, 2008; 18(10): 1401 - 1412. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. A. Brondani, M. I. MacEntee, S. R. Bryant, and B. O'Neill Using Written Vignettes in Focus Groups Among Older Adults to Discuss Oral Health as a Sensitive Topic Qual Health Res, August 1, 2008; 18(8): 1145 - 1153. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. E. Blixen, A. Singh, and H. Thacker Values and Beliefs About Obesity and Weight Reduction Among African American and Caucasian Women J Transcult Nurs, July 1, 2006; 17(3): 290 - 297. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. Davey, S. Dziurawiec, and A. O'Brien-Malone Men's Voices: Postnatal Depression From the Perspective of Male Partners Qual Health Res, February 1, 2006; 16(2): 206 - 220. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. Duggleby What About Focus Group Interaction Data? Qual Health Res, July 1, 2005; 15(6): 832 - 840. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Hollander The Social Contexts of Focus Groups Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, October 1, 2004; 33(5): 602 - 637. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Davidson, K. Introna, J. Daly, G. Paull, R. Jarvis, J. Angus, T. Wilds, J. Cockburn, M. Dunford, and K. Dracup Cardiorespiratory Nurses' Perceptions of Palliative Care in Nonmalignant Disease: Data for the Development of Clinical Practice Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2003; 12(1): 47 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Kidd and M. B. Parshall Getting the Focus and the Group: Enhancing Analytical Rigor in Focus Group Research Qual Health Res, May 1, 2000; 10(3): 293 - 308. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Twinn The analysis of focus group data: A challenge to the rigour of qualitative research Journal of Research in Nursing, March 1, 2000; 5(2): 140 - 146. [Abstract] [PDF]