Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Health Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nijhof, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nijhof, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Heterogeneity in the Interpretation of Epilepsy

Gerhard Nijhof

Department of Sociology, University of Amsterdam

In the life stories of 20 women and men, diagnosed as having epilepsy, diversity in the interpretations of epilepsy is researched. Early research has presented a rather homogeneous picture of the individual interpretation of epilepsy. The research has been criticized for the failure to distinguish between the interpretations of the self and those of others and the probability of a discrepancy between the two. The criticism put forward here is directed at the unwarranted homogeneity in the interpretations of the self. This homogeneity, it is suggested, is the result of factors such as the use of homogenetic concepts preset by the researcher, the use of encompassing concepts, not allowing for differentiation and heterogeneity, and the presentation of homogeneity by the researcher him/herself. In the interpretations observed in this research, heterogeneity is found. In life stories from the same individual, different interpretations are observed. Next to medical interpretations of "disease," those of "normality" and "abnormality" are ascribed to epilepsy, depending on whether the informants speak for themselves or are the spokesperson for "others. " Furthermore, the interpretation of abnormality appears to be formulated in an ambiguous and vaguely defined language. In the life stories, epilepsy appears thus not to have a homogeneous meaning but is constructed as a heterogeneous social phenomenon.

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 8, No. 1, 95-105 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/104973239800800107


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
C. A. Faircloth, C. Boylstein, M. Rittman, and J. F. Gubrium
Constructing the Stroke: Sudden-Onset Narratives of Stroke Survivors
Qual Health Res, September 1, 2005; 15(7): 928 - 941.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
Other Articles Noted
Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 1998; 1(4): 100 - 104.
[Full Text]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
C. A. Faircloth
Epilepsies, Identities, and Difference: Horizons of Meaning for Individuals with an Epilepsy
Qual Health Res, September 1, 1998; 8(5): 602 - 617.
[Abstract] [PDF]