Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Health Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Creating Moral Space in Prenatal Genetic Services

Gwen Anderson

Division of Social Science, Ethics & Law, Shriver Center, Waltham, MA 02154, Ganderson{at}shriver.org

The purpose of this article is to explicate clear research methods for doing phenomenology and hermeneutics and state how they converge into narrative ethics. Phenomenology, hermeneutics, and narrative ethics are used to explore values and beliefs that influence decision-making practices of 12 expectant couples who were eligible for prenatal genetic testing due to advanced maternal age. Seven couples who accepted and 5 couple who declined testing volunteered for this study; women and spouses were interviewed separately. Three methods for analyzing 32 verbatim interviews were developed from Husserl's descriptive theory and Heidegger's interpretive theory. Excerpts from the findings show how each provides a layer of knowledge and how they converge into a larger conversation that informs practice. The research outcomes produced (a) descriptive narratives, (b) three conceptual thematic patterns of human responding, and (c) hermeneutic interpretive exemplars. Phenomenology, hermeneutic, and narrative ethics separately and collectively offer women and their partners a way to participate in defining moral, ethical, and social issues emanating from prenatal genetic technology.

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, 168-187 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/104973239800800203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
K. Chamberlain
Methodolatry and Qualitative Health Research
J Health Psychol, May 1, 2000; 5(3): 285 - 296.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
G. Anderson
Nondirectiveness in Prenatal Genetics: patients read between the lines
Nursing Ethics, March 1, 1999; 6(2): 126 - 136.
[Abstract] [PDF]