Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Health Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bazeley, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bazeley, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Bricoleur with a Computer: Piecing Together Qualitative and Quantitative Data

Pat Bazeley

Research Development Unit at the University of Western Sydney Macarthur

The researcher as bricoleur will gather whatever data is at hand, experimenting and exploring to find answers to the questions he or she has set. With computer in hand and new tools available, the researcher can readily combine data types, moving beyond complementarity and simple triangulation. Data may be transferred in either or both directions between NUD•IST (a program to assist the analysis of qualitative data) and a spreadsheet or statistical package. Thus, analysis and interpretation are enriched, and new ways of thinking about data are laid open. Such techniques inevitably challenge traditional assumptions about particular methods. But perhaps in the final analysis, all methods, other than those employed in reductionist, hypothesis testing experiments, are essentially interpretive.

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, 279-287 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/104973299129121749


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Mixed Methods ResearchHome page
D. Freshwater
Reading Mixed Methods Research: Contexts for Criticism
Journal of Mixed Methods Research, April 1, 2007; 1(2): 134 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
L. S. Giddings
Mixed-methods research: Positivism dressed in drag?
Journal of Research in Nursing, May 1, 2006; 11(3): 195 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
J. Moran-Ellis, V. D. Alexander, A. Cronin, M. Dickinson, J. Fielding, J. Sleney, and H. Thomas
Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications
Qualitative Research, February 1, 2006; 6(1): 45 - 59.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
S. Kinn and J. Curzio
Integrating qualitative and quantitative research methods
Journal of Research in Nursing, May 1, 2005; 10(3): 317 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]