Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Health Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coffman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Coffman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Mutual Intentionality: A Theory of Support Processes in Pregnant African American Women

Sherrilyn Coffman

Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, scoffman{at}sierrahealth.com

Marilyn A. Ray

Florida Atlantic University, College of Nursing, Boca Raton, FL

The grounded theory study described in this article explored social support processes in low-income African American women during high-risk pregnancy and early parenthood. Participants included 10 pregnant African American women, 3 close support providers, and 11 health care providers. Investigators served as participant observers and conducted audiotaped interviews. The substantive theory of support that emerged from the data was labeled "mutual intentionality." This term described the active role that both pregnant woman and support givers played in the helping process. The phrase "being there" summarized the women’s definition of support, implying that the support giver was available and willing to provide help when needed. Support was further described as "caring,""respecting,""sharing information" with, "knowing,""believing in," and "doing for" the other. For support to happen, mutuality must be established within the relationship, and both support giver and recipient intentionally aim to meet the recipient’s identified needs.

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 9, No. 4, 479-492 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/104973299129122018
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
P. Williams, L. Barclay, and V. Schmied
Defining Social Support in Context: A Necessary Step in Improving Research, Intervention, and Practice
Qual Health Res, September 1, 2004; 14(7): 942 - 960.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
K. D. Fergus, R. E. Gray, M. I. Fitch, M. Labrecque, and C. Phillips
Active Consideration: Conceptualizing Patient-Provided Support for Spouse Caregivers in the Context of Prostate Cancer
Qual Health Res, April 1, 2002; 12(4): 492 - 514.
[Abstract] [PDF]