This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nardi, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Nardi, D. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Ethical and Methodological Issues in Evaluating a Perinatal Addiction Treatment Program with a Fluid Population

Indiana University, Gary, IN

A naturalistic field study was used to evaluate a fluid sample population in an addiction treatment program. This article presents the methodological and ethical issues in program evaluation confronted by the author and the approaches developed to address them. Methodological issues include credibility and fittingness of instruments, lack of standardization of histories, replication, trust issues of subjects, attrition, client follow-up, and rapidly changing subject population. Ethical issues include informed consent, interpretation of data from a cultural bias-free perspective, and client follow-up. A semistructured interview schedule allowed for standardization of the questioning format and replication of data gathering. Triangulation of data enhanced validity and internal stability. A fluid sample frame can optimally reflect the population in the program under study if available resources are used effectively while protecting patient rights to privacy, confidentiality, and freedom from manipulation.

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 9, No. 4, 559-567 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/104973299129121974


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?