|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Reflexive Journaling on Emotional Research Topics: Ethical Issues for Team Researchers
Claudia Malacrida
University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada, claudia.malacrida{at}uleth.ca
Traditional epistemological concerns in qualitative research focus on the effects of researchers' values and emotions on choices of research topics, power relations with research participants, and the influence of researcher standpoints on data collection and analysis. However, the research process also affects the researchers' values, emotions, and standpoints. Drawing on reflexive journal entries of assistant researchers involved in emotionally demanding team research, this article explores issues of emotional fallout for research team members, the implications of hierarchical power imbalances on research teams, and the importance of providing ethical opportunities for reflexive writing about the challenges of doing emotional research. Such reflexive approaches ensure the emotional safety of research team members and foster opportunities for emancipatory consciousness among research team members.
Key Words: reflexivity emotional research topics journaling transcription and coding emancipatory research
References
- Alcoff, L.M. (1995). The problem of speaking for others. In J. Roof & R. Wiegman (Eds.), Who can speak? Authority and critical identity (pp. 97-119). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
- Alcoff, L., & Potter, E. (Eds.). (1993). Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.
- Barry, C.A., Britten, N., Barber, N., Bradley, C., & Stevenson, F. (1999). Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 26-44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Code, L. (1996). Taking subjectivity into account. In A. Garry & M. Pearsall (Eds.), Women, knowledge, and reality: Explorations in feminist philosophy (pp. 14-48). New York: Routledge.
- Corbin, J., & Morse, J.M. (2003). The unstructured interactive interview: Issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics. Qualitative Inquiry, 9, 335-354.[Abstract]
- Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
- Gregory, D., Russell, C.K., & Phillips, L.R. (1997). Beyond textual perfection: Transcribers as vulnerable persons. Qualitative Health Research, 7, 294-300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Grinyer, A. (2004). The narrative correspondence method: What a follow-up study can tell us about the longer term effect on participants in emotionally demanding research. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 1326-1341.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Haraway, D. (1991). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 183-202). New York: Routledge.
- Harding, S. (1987). Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 1-14). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- Jaggar, A.M. (1996). Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. In A. Garry & M. Pearsall (Eds.), Women, knowledge, and reality: Explorations in feminist epistemology (pp. 166-190). New York: Routledge.
- Korth, B. (2002). Critical qualitative research as consciousness raising: The dialogic texts of research/researchee interactions. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 381-403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kremenitzer, J.P. (2005). The emotionally intelligent early childhood educator: Self-reflective journaling. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33, 3-9.
- Lee, R.E., Eppler, C., Kendal, N., & Latty, C. (2001). Critical incidents in the professional lives of first MFT students. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 23, 51-61.
- Mauthner, N., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology, 37, 413-431.[Abstract]
- May, R.A.B., & Pattillo-Mccoy, M. (2000). Do you see what I see? Examining a collaborative ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 6, 65-87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist action research. In Feminist methods in social research (pp. 175-198). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Rogers-Dillon, R.H. (2005). Hierarchical qualitative research teams: Refining the methodology. Qualitative Research, 5, 437-454.[Abstract]
- Ruthman, J., Jackson, J., Cluskey, M., Flannigan, P., Folse, V., & Bunten, J. (2004). Using clinical journaling to capture critical thinking across the curriculum. Nursing Education Perspectives, 25, 120-123.
- Scannel-Desch, E.A. (2005). Lessons learned and advice from Vietnam War nurses: A qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 49, 600-607.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Smith, D.E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
- Smith, D.E. (1990). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
- Tillman, L.C. (2003). Mentoring, reflection, and reciprocal journaling. Theory Into Practice, 42, 226-233.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Waagstrom, G.H. (2005). The rural physician associate program: New directions in education for competency. Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice, 18, 379-386.[CrossRef]
- Wheatley, E.E. (2005). Risk, reflexivity, and an elusory body: Transformation in studying illness. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34, 68-100.[Abstract]
Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 17, No. 10,
1329-1339 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1049732307308948

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Karnieli-Miller, R. Strier, and L. Pessach
Power Relations in Qualitative Research
Qual Health Res,
February 1, 2009;
19(2):
279 - 289.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|