|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Qualitative Science Policy
Carl Mitcham
Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA,cmitcham{at}mines.edu
Qualitative research struggles against a tide of quantitative methods. To assist in this struggle, it is useful to consider the historical and philosophical origins of quantitative methods as well as criticisms that have been raised against them. Although these criticisms have often been restricted to discussions in the philosophy of science, they have become increasingly prominent in debates regarding science policy. This article thus reviews current science policy debates concerning scientific autonomy and the linear model of science—society relationships. Then, having considered the multiple meanings of quality, it argues for a science policy reassessment of quantitative research, for deeper engagements between science policy and the social sciences, and finally, for a more explicit alliance between science policy and qualitative methods.
Key Words: philosophy of science • qualitative science • quantitative science • science policy • science—society relations
References
- Bozeman, B., & Sarewitz, D. (2005). Public values and public failure in U.S. science policy. Science and Public Policy, 32(2), 119-136.
- Brooks, H. (1968). The government of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Bush, V. (1945). Science: The endless frontier. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Callahan, D. (2003). What price better health? Hazards of the research imperative. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Dunn, W.N. (1994). Public policy analysis: An introduction (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Halal, W. E., & Taylor, K. B. (Eds.). (1999). Twenty-first century economics: Perspectives of socioeconomics for a changing world. New York: St. Martin's.
- Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), 696-701.[Web of Science]
- Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Sage.
- Lambright, H.W. (1998). Science, technology, and public policy. In J. M. Shafritz (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public policy administration (Vol. 4, pp. 2032-2036). Boulder, CO: Westview.
- Lasswell, H.D. (1968). Policy sciences. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 12, pp. 181-189). New York: Macmillan.
- Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: HarperCollins.
- Lerner, D., & Lasswell, H. D. (Eds.). (1951). The policy sciences: Recent developments in scope and method. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Mitcham, C., & Frodeman, R. (2002). The plea for balance in the public funding of science. Technology in Society, 24(1/2), 83-92.[CrossRef]
- Mooney, C. (2005). The Republican war on science. New York: Basic Books.
- Nagel, S. S. (Ed.). (1994). Encyclopedia of policy studies (2nd ed., rev. and exp.). New York: Marcel Dekker.
- Ng, Y.-K., & Ho, L.-S. (Eds.). (2006). Happiness and public policy: Theory, case studies, and implications. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Proctor, R. (1995). Cancer wars: How politics shapes what we know and don't know about cancer. New York: HarperCollins.
- Ross, A. (Ed.). (1996). Science wars. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Stokey, E., & Zeckhauser, R. (1978). A primer for policy analysis. New York: Norton.
Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 17, No. 10,
1434-1441 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1049732307308951
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
B. Stige, K. Malterud, and T. Midtgarden
Toward an Agenda for Evaluation of Qualitative Research
Qual Health Res,
October 1, 2009;
19(10):
1504 - 1516.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
