Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Health Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, S.
Right arrow Articles by Seale, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, S.
Right arrow Articles by Seale, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Learning to Do Qualitative Data Analysis: An Observational Study of Doctoral Work

Sarah Li

Kingston University and St. George's, University of London

Clive Seale

Brunel University

Using examples from written assignments and supervisory dialogues, the authors report a longitudinal observational case study of a doctoral research project, focusing on the teaching and learning of qualitative data analysis on a project that involved coding and analysis of nursing talk. Written drafts contain concrete exemplars illustrating the problems and solutions discussed in supervisions. Early problems include the difficulty of knowing where to start with coding, ambiguities in the definition of codes, inaccurate reporting and recording of data, failure to distinguish researcher and actor categories, and overinterpretation of evidence. Solutions to these problems required their accurate identification, communication of practical solutions, and care in the interactional management of delivery and receipt of feedback. This detailed analysis informs readers of sources of validity, rigor, and, eventually, creativity in carrying out a social research project. It also assists in explicating an apprenticeship model for the learning of research skills.

Key Words: research methods • qualitative data analysis • pedagogy • PhD supervision • social research

References

  • Acker, S., Hill, T., & Black, E. (1994). Thesis supervision in the social-sciences: Managed or negotiated. Higher Education, 28(4), 483-498.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Becker, H.S. (1998). Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you're doing it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Blanton, J.S. (1983). Midwifing the dissertation. Teaching of Psychology, 10(2), 74-76.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data analysis: Complementary strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Connell, R.W. (1985). How to supervise a PhD. Vestes, 2, 38-41.
  • Delamont, S., Atkinson, P.A., Parry, O. (2000). The doctoral experience. Success and failure in graduate school. London: Falmer.
  • Gibbs, G.R. (2002). Qualitative data analysis: Explorations with NVivo. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  • Greatbatch, D. (1992). On the management of disagreement between news interviewees. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 268-301). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hammersley, M. (2004). Teaching qualitative method: Craft, profession or bricolage? In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 549-560). London: Sage.
  • Heath, C. (1992). Diagnosis in the general-practice consultation. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 235-267). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heritage, J., & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first-time mothers In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 359-417). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hockey, J. (1996). Motives and meaning amongst PhD supervisors in the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(4), 489-506.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Hyatt, D.F. (2005). "Yes, a very good point!": A critical genre analysis of a corpus of feedback commentaries on master of education assignments. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(3), 339-353.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Li, S. (2002). Symbiotic niceness: A study of psychosocial care in palliative care settings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London, United Kingdom.
  • Li, S. (2004). Symbiotic niceness: Constructing a therapeutic relationship in psychosocial palliative care. Social Science & Medicine, 58(12), 2571-2583.[CrossRef]
  • Li, S. (2005). Doing criticism in "symbiotic niceness": A study of palliative care nurses' talk. Social Science & Medicine, 60(9), 1949-1959.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Li, S., & Seale, C. (in press). Managing criticism in PhD supervision: A qualitative case study. Oxfordshire, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education.
  • Maynard, D.W. (1992). On clinicians co-implicating recipients' perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 331-358). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  • Mills, C. (1959). On intellectual craftsmanship. In L. Gross (Ed.), Symposium on sociological theory (pp. 25-53). Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
  • Pomerantz, A. (1987). Description in legal settings. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 226-243). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
  • Quinton, S., & Smallbone, T. (2005). The troublesome triplets: Issues in teaching reliability, validity and generalization to business students. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(3), 299-311.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Roulston, K. (2001). Data analysis and "theorizing as ideology." Qualitative Research, 1(3), 279-302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Salmon, P. (1992). Achieving a PhD: Ten students' experience. Stoke on Trent, UK: Trentham.
  • Schutz, A. (1953). Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 14(1), 1-38.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Seale, C. (1999). The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage
  • Seale, C. (2004a). Coding and analysing data. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture (pp. 305-323). London: Sage.
  • Seale, C. (2004b). Researching society and culture. London: Sage.
  • Tonkiss, F. (2004). Analysing text and speech: Content and discourse analysis. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture (pp. 367-382). London: Sage.
  • Wisker, G. (2005). The good supervisor: Supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Wisker, G., Robinson, G., Trafford, V., Creighton, E., & Warnes, M. (2003). Recognizing and overcoming dissonance in postgraduate student. Studies in Higher Education, 28(1), 91-105.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • van Manen, M. (2006). Writing qualitatively, or the demands of writing. Qualitative Health Research, 16(5), 713-722.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Yin, R.K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.

Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 17, No. 10, 1442-1452 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1049732307306924


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SociologyHome page
S. Li and C. Seale
Acquiring a Sociological Identity: An Observational Study of a PhD Project
Sociology, October 1, 2008; 42(5): 987 - 1002.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, S.
Right arrow Articles by Seale, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, S.
Right arrow Articles by Seale, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?