Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Health Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1049732309335395v1
19/6/815    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burke, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ewing, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burke, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ewing, L. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Obesity
*Weight Control
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Experiences of Self-Monitoring: Successes and Struggles During Treatment for Weight Loss

Lora E. Burke*, Valerie Swigart, Melanie Warziski Turk, Nicole Derro, and Linda J. Ewing

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lbu100{at}pitt.edu.


   Abstract
We interviewed 15 individuals who completed a behavioral weight loss treatment study with the aim of exploring participants’ reflections on their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors while using a paper diary to self-monitor their diet. Constant comparative and matrix analysis procedures were used to analyze interview data; the qualitative results were then interfaced with descriptive numerical data on individuals’ adherence to self-monitoring and weight loss. Three categories of self-monitoring experience were identified: (a) well-disciplined—those who had high adherence to self-monitoring, high weight loss, and a "can do" positive approach, (b) missing the connection—those who had moderate adherence, moderate- to low weight loss, and an "it’s an assignment" approach, without integrating self-monitoring into everyday life, and (c) diminished support—those who had poor adherence, poor weight control, and were adversely affected by coexisting negative factors. Given the variations in how individuals integrated the process of self-monitoring, we need to consider individualizing self-monitoring strategies to improve adherence.

First published on April 13, 2009, doi:10.1177/1049732309335395

Qualitative Health Research 2009;19:815.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?